Journal of Conflict Resolution 34 4 — Anomalies: ultimatums, dictators and manners. Journal of Economic Perspectives — Cason, TimothyN. A laboratorystudyof group polarization in the team dictator game. Economic Journal — Cognitive adaptations for social exchange.
Barkow, L. Tooby ed. Cottrell, Nickolas B. Performance in the presence of other human beings. Mere presence, audience and affiliation effects.
Theory of mind and the Ultimatum Game in healthy adult aging.
Simmel, R. Milton ed. Social Facilitation and Imitative Behavior. Child abuse and other risks of not living with both parents. Eagly, Alice. Sex differences in social behavior: a social role theory interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
See a Problem?
Eckel, Catherine C. Chivalryand solidarityin ultimatum games. As catalogued in EconLit abstracts. The relative price of fairness: gender differences in a punishment game.
Feingold, Alan. Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin — Greenlees, Ian A.
Sex and age differences in preferences and tactics of mate attraction: analysis of published advertisements. Ethology and Sociobiology — An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining.
Hamilton, William D. The genetical evolution of social behavior. Journal of Theoretical Biology— Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games. American Economic Review 86 3 — Cooperation and optimal responding in the prisoner's dilemma game: effects of sex and physical attractiveness.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology — Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Fairness and the assumptions of economics. Journal of Business — Kohler, Maxie P. It helps quantify how much inequality side 2 is willing to accept and at what point they revolt. The game can be played as a one-off decision or an iterated repeated game with rounds. The game can be played in isolation or as part of a larger competition between the groups. After both sides make their choice, the game ends.
This version allows for as many rounds as needed for both sides to start to recognize patterns in the game.https://kejulygu.tk
After a series of rounds, both sides should begin to see the cut-off point where a specific dollar amount will be accepted or rejected. Group version: In this version, the sides are not simply competing against each other but against other teams as well. This version promotes more equality and fairness in the decision making process because too many rejections will decrease the totals for both sides in the larger competition. This game can be created easily on VoiceThread. You can create a VoiceThread with the instructions and enough slides for each group to play their game.
Simply upload your slides and record your comments, then drag and drop your VoiceThread into your group! Throughout history, groups in power have made decisions that impact groups with less power.
We see examples of this when learning about colonialism, governmental systems, trade negotiations, the legislative process to name just a few examples. To use The Ultimatum Game with history classes, decide which role side 1 will play and which role side 2 will play. Maybe side 1 plays the role of government leaders and side 2 plays the role of the people in the country or maybe they each represent different groups from the lessons you are teaching. In this example, side 1 is the King of England and side 2 represents the American colonists in We argue that in the ultimatum game the effects of altruistic behavior and reciprocity vary more in the spectrum of positively compared to negatively-valenced relationships.
Thus, we suggest that social distance effects are asymmetric. Our experimental results support this hypothesis; in the region of positively-valenced relationships, the proposers increase the percentage they offer as relationship quality increases more drastically compared to when the relationship is negatively-valenced, in which case they appear more invariant to relationship effects.
Related The Ultimatum
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved